Peter Haworth wrote: > Actually, shouldn't we be able to use bristolbath.pm.org? >
Well, we've got bristol.pm and bath.pm, but not bristolbath.pm So potentially the people from bristol could have bristol.pm... and the people from bath could have bath.pm... Or you could just have perl.bristolbath.org I guess I could apply to see if they would create bristolbath.pm for us. I think the problem before was that mailman doesn't let you rename a list, as I was given bath and bristol pm it worked out easier this way. Lyle _______________________________________________ BristolBathPM mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
