On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:28:41 +0000, Lyle wrote:
> Peter Haworth wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:44:26 +0000, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> >> Just for what it's worth based on my experience of these things -
> >> pick a time and a place and stick to it until you have critical
> >> mass to move around. Whatever you decide, I'd strongly suggest
> >> having some kind of predictable algorithm for the where & when,
> >> and publish that up on your website (actual dates, times, and
> >> places).
> >
> > I agree in principle, but given the lack of organization so far
> > this month, it may be worth breaking the rule just this once,
> > while we still don't have the schedule officially mapped out
> > anywhere.
>
> It's a good idea, and maybe something we should look at implementing
> once the site is on a Wiki where we can all make updates and
> delegate sections to each other.
You've just gone wiki mad, haven't you? In the meantime, can you at
least update the existing meeting page with something a bit less
vague? :-)
> Sorry for the lack of organisation this month but I honestly thought
> everyone preferred the idea of a meet every other month...
Every month is a lot easier to remember, I think.
> BPM last meet announcement was sent on the same day as the meet, LPM
> has been known to leave some meet details until the last minute as
> well so we aren't doing anything out of the ordinary. I like the
> idea of different venues as it makes things a bit more fun.
If the meetings are on a fixed schedule, organization of a venue is
much less of a consideration. Just stick with the same venue each time
unless announced sufficiently far in advance (a week, say).
--
Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N)
_______________________________________________
BristolBathPM mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
