Peter Haworth wrote: > > > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:40:20 +0000, Lyle wrote: > > Also how long for the workshop? I was thinking 2hrs per group session. > > Possibly 2 group sessions. So I propose the very loose, draft format:- > > > > 10am Meet and greet > > 10:30am Divide into groups (I was thinking do a quick experience check, > > and give each group an even skill spread) > > 10:40am Assign area(s) (maybe two areas at a time) > > 12:30pm Presentations > > 1:30pm Lunch > > 2:00pm Possibly re-jig groups > > 2:15pm Assign area(s) > > 4:00pm Presentations > > 4:30pm Closing & Thanks > > > > Everyone has an opinion, so feedback please. > > That all looks good, though that's a bit late for lunch for me. However, > the question remains: what constitutes an investigation? Do we just cast > people adrift with a copy of the relevant synopsis? Do we convert the > synopses into tutorials somehow? Are the groups lead by experts (or > relative experts)?
What do you suggest? I was thinking sending people adrift and seeing what they come up with. In my mind this workshop is almost as much of an experiment to see what comes out... Lyle _______________________________________________ BristolBathPM mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
