HI Alex,

    I don't have any numbers to offer about speed.

    I think programmer speed is a big consideration though - I personally
opt for really simple template solutions like Template::Simple.

    I have seen some brain-busting Mason templates that although they may
execute quickly require 1/2 a day to get your head around - so the ongoing
cost £££ can be high. TT comes with yet another syntax to learn and another
place to look for potential bugs.

Nige


On 11 June 2010 10:25, Alex Francis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anyone have recent experience of comparing performance between Mason
> and Template Toolkit? I was just chatting with collleagues about how
> TT is "nicer" but Mason's performance is much better, hence we use the
> latter.
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> BristolBathPM mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
>



-- 
NIgel Hamilton
CEO
T10 = Search Engine + Ad Network

Turbo10 Limited,
Fairfax House,
15 Fulwood Place,
London WC1V 6AY
T:  +44 (0) 117 946 6397
F:   +44 (0) 117 923 8672
E:  [email protected]
W:  http://t10.com
----------------------------------------------------
T10 = Search Engine + Ad Network                                       Visit
http://t10.com
_______________________________________________
BristolBathPM mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm

Reply via email to