HI Alex,
I don't have any numbers to offer about speed.
I think programmer speed is a big consideration though - I personally
opt for really simple template solutions like Template::Simple.
I have seen some brain-busting Mason templates that although they may
execute quickly require 1/2 a day to get your head around - so the ongoing
cost £££ can be high. TT comes with yet another syntax to learn and another
place to look for potential bugs.
Nige
On 11 June 2010 10:25, Alex Francis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyone have recent experience of comparing performance between Mason
> and Template Toolkit? I was just chatting with collleagues about how
> TT is "nicer" but Mason's performance is much better, hence we use the
> latter.
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> BristolBathPM mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
>
--
NIgel Hamilton
CEO
T10 = Search Engine + Ad Network
Turbo10 Limited,
Fairfax House,
15 Fulwood Place,
London WC1V 6AY
T: +44 (0) 117 946 6397
F: +44 (0) 117 923 8672
E: [email protected]
W: http://t10.com
----------------------------------------------------
T10 = Search Engine + Ad Network Visit
http://t10.com
_______________________________________________
BristolBathPM mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm