Another reason perhaps why voting has been poor this year is due to the lack of candidates, particularly for the named positions on the board. I believe I'm correct in saying that for the named positions, (secretary, chairman, treasurer etc) there is only one candidate running. If your vote cannot make a difference then why bother (especially as there seems to be no quoracy issue at this point)

On a second point (and this one could well just be me being a bit thick and failing to look stuff up) i for one am not certain how clear it has been made how many positions there are on the board, and whether all the named positions have candidates running for them (I have a feeling there were more named positions last year), and what the criteria are for filling any un-manned named positions (if thre are any, or if any become available in the year) - will one of the 'without portfolio' candidates do it or will there be a second round of elections?

Just some thoughts

Woody (Atomic Horse)



_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp

Reply via email to