>> Understood, I figured they might. The issue is going to be any existing %*s >> code that >> erroneously relied on that behavior. A quick scan through the sources >> reveals just a few places >> %*s is used that will need to be reviewed: > > Okay, so I guess I should do that since I started all the trouble. > Any problems with me taking that on? (Or maybe we could split up the > work...). Sean?
No worries, I'm already working through reviewing them. I'm used to refactor lists like this... I'm just glad to see someone else make a proper fix that unveils a history of buggy assumptions. It's great. ;) Cheers! Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
