On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:19 AM, phoenix <284281...@qq.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Clifford Yapp <cliffy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> **
>
> Well, minimally, be sure you schedule some time to work on implementing
>> some means of converting arbitrary CSG primitives to brep form - csgbrep is
>> going to be too inflexible for general testing. You'll want the basic
>> primitive -> brep ability early in the process, since it will be key to
>> testing your results.
>>
>
> Now I have already add an option to the brep command in MGED, so that I
> can use it to covert an arbitrary implicit primitive to brep, and the
> syntax is just as what you said. The test of the conversion becomes much
> easier and more convenient now. Thanks for your advises. As for this is
> still incomplete (I would still modify it during the project, and the
> ability to convert a CSG tree will be added, but it can be used now), I
> wonder whether it's suitable to make it a patch (so that I can share it
> with others and they can use this feature). What do you think?
>
Sure - as long as making a patch for it won't take too much time, go ahead
and post it (particularly if it's a working feature!). Even if it needs
clean-up you can get feedback on it, and you can point to the additional
patch in your application as well.
CY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
