On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> I've been interested in llvm for some time, and I finally got around to
> testing it with BRL-CAD. I first built llvm and clang from the current svn
> trunk, but that generated a crash report (llvm bug 16921 just submitted to
> llvm.org).
>
> Then I installed clang+llvm (v. 3.3.0) on Debian amd64 from pre-built
> binaries and got a good BRL-CAD build (but I haven't done the regression
> tests yet) and thought the following compilation timings from my 4-cpu box
> might be interesting to some users:
Cool, thanks for sharing Tom. It'd be interesting to see how gcc 4.7 fairs
under the same conditions.
I presume with those timings that it wasn't an optimized release build? What
are the timings with release enabled (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release)?
Cheers!
Sean
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
