On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Daniel Roßberg <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no getppid() in the Microsoft C library. > > Do we really need the parent's process ID? > Do we really have to use temporary files there? > Do we really need bu_arg_parse.cpp or is it for testing only?
No, no, and not yet--it's test only at the moment. The pid and files usage was a stupid move to avoid malloc, but the better solution is using static buffers akin to bu_progname (but not yet implemented). Thanks for reporting the problem, Daniel. Best regards, -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
