> I vote for eliminating the %V and improving the name of "bu_vls_addr" I'd keep %V for brevity and for consistency with bu_sscanf's support of %V, but as someone who found "bu_vls_addr" to be rather unintuitive when I first came across it, I'd be happy to see it changed. I like your suggestion of "bu_vls_cstr".
> And if the %V is eliminated, under C99/POSIX does bu_vls_printf have any use? I think yes, if for no other reason than that we control it and can adapt it to meet unforeseen future needs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
