On Dec 3, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Tom Browder wrote: >> Fix return checks. Looks like r58729 went from wrong (incorrect operator >> precedence) to still wrong (not a predicate return). > > Shouldn't that be <= 0?
The function is not documented, but the current implementation returns 1 on success and -1 on failure. It should probably return a 0/1 boolean instead, but all callers would need to be checked and possibly updated. Cheers! Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
