On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Clifford Yapp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Tom Browder <[email protected]> wrote: >> need be). IMHO, the C++ version is simpler to maintain, > > I think we need an independent opinion on the "simpler to maintain" > point
You're, of course, correct. > Also, remember we may end up removing Boost entirely at some point in the > future. Granted, that's why I've been suggesting collecting useful C++ functions into some king of utility cpp library. > I'm missing something here - my understanding was this tool only > generates xml and html outputs reporting on pre-defined standard > attributes. If that's the case, it executes only during compilation. The tool does, but the various attr lookup functions (now sets and maps in cpp, and planned to be unordered maps) I believe are used often during processing of attrs during the often long-runningmodelling process. > Modifying standard attributes will be a very rare process. True. > It's not clear to me that user contributed attributes (and the meaning of that > phrase is itself a bit unclear) would or should be part of the core > man page. The current reading may not be the best but it's my interpretation of one of Sean's goals. Bets regards, -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
