>
> This may be what their intention is, but it is not what their license
> terms actually state. This is a common incorrect interpretation that open
> source use is not a commercial use. Especially under US law (and most
> jurisdictions that come to mind), it very much is a commercial activity,
> even if no money is involved (but money could be involved too). CC-BY-NC
> is a no-go.
>
> If they are okay with open source projects using their charts, then they
> should state that (by licensing under a standard open source use license
> like CC-BY or even GPL).
Thanks for the clarification. I thought if we had a go-ahead from them,
then we could use it but I was clearly wrong. Moving to a different library
should not be a problem but my only concern is it would push back the
schedule by a few days. I am done with the initial charts using
HighCharts.js, and migrating them might take some time, so please be
patient. :)
Please compare libraries within boundaries set, to make a better
> choice for this project.
I will look into the other libraries again and try to pick an alternative
as soon as possible.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
www.restlet.com/download
http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
