On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Mihai Neacsu <mihai.mnea...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I don't know the status of the server but there are few alternatives
> to mod_wsgi [0]. They're all pretty much ok with the exception of CGI
> which pays a big penalty for the interpreter launch on each request.
>
> Mihai
>
>
> [0 ]https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ServerArrangements
Mihai, thanks for pointing out the alternatives, I had a look at them a
while back before deciding mod_wsgi should be the best way out when using
an Apache server. Apparently, CGI is pretty inefficient and spawns a new
process on each request, so that's ruled out. Further, mod_wsgi is more
actively maintained, and performs better than mod_python. It's also easier
to setup and a more popular choice by a large margin.
--
Ankesh Anand
*Undergrad,Mathematics and Computing at*
*Indian Institute of Technology,Kharagpur*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
