On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Daniel Roßberg <danielmrossb...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Kalpit,
>
> As an addition to Sean's e-mail: I'm a little bit in favor for option 1.  
> I implemented once a function similar to option 2 and must learn that using 
> random numbers can lead to a random result.  I.e. two calls of the function 
> give two different results.  Although both are inside the desired accuracy 
> it's a permanent issue to explain why they are different.
>
Yes, so it's decided we're going ahead with the first approach after a 
discussion on IRC with Sean and Vasco. Anyways, I want to study the second 
approach just for my knowledge. :)

> > PS : To Daniel - The Pipe implementation patch update is pending review. 
> Is it possible to review it anytime soon? :)
>
> Unfortunately no.  Currently I've no real computer available.  I'm writing 
> these lines on a tablet.  But I'll take care for the necessary adjustments 
> if it interferes with your other patches.
>
No problem. It can be sorted out later. 

> > PPS : Also, before I start out on generic method, I'll be working on 
> getting rt^3 in accordance to the recent shifts in header files. Does that 
> sound good?
>
> Indeed, it does :-)
>
Awesome. I have already made the patch for the same and uploaded it to 
SourceForge. You can find it here 
<https://sourceforge.net/p/brlcad/patches/372/>. :D

So I have studied the gqa and rtweight methods through it's documentation 
and also discussed with Sean on IRC. Now I need to study it's code and 
decide how would I go about achieving the integrated functionality of gqa 
and rtweight in practice. I'll be starting that from Monday onwards. Also, 
Sean said it needs to lie in src/libanalyze and hence I have to decide on 
how would I do that as well. 

You have any suggestions on how should I start understanding the code and 
constructing my roadmap to the final functionality and refactoring scheme? 
I'd love to hear some. :)

With Regards,
Kalpit Thakkar
 

>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
> brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel

Reply via email to