Thanks Shubham for guiding me to start working on the project.

Based on your feedback ill try the following now:

1) Run the app in free-bsd environment.
2) Fix small pending issues to make the app more polished and production
ready.

PS: I would like to hear the feedback from others as well.
On 06-Mar-2016 7:03 AM, "Shubham Chauhan" <shubham13...@iiitd.ac.in> wrote:

> Hey!
>
>
>> I am eager in contributing to the OGV project and want to add some
>> patches. There are multiple versions of the projects done by many past GSoC
>> students. I wanted to know the appropriate branch to start working.
>>
>
> This is the repo maintained for OGV-meteor code.
> https://github.com/BRL-CAD/OGV-meteor/
> The master branch consists of the GSoC'14 work whereas the
> 'GSOC2015-merged' branch consists of the GSoC'15 work.
> The basic functionalities have been implemented in the master branch. the
> GSOC15-merged branch will have many other advanced functionalities that
> were implemented last year.
> I guess the branch you work on will depend on the thing you want to
> implement. You can actually choose from these two.
>
>
>> I had some ideas that could be incorporated in the project:
>>
>> 1) Private Teams : Teams could create private projects and groups. Better
>> project management capabilities could be added.
>>
>> 2) Cloud Rendering : People could initiate the render of 3d models
>> directly from the web browser.
>>
>> 3) Annotation : For better productivity users could annotate and comment
>> on images and 3d models directly from the web browser.
>>
>> 4) Embeddable 3D Viewer : widget that could be added in any HTML Page.
>> Basically it would be an iframe.
>>
>> Sounds good! (Especially pt. 4). But we'll have our initial (and major)
> focus on making OGV a complete product rather than adding more features.
> Additional features can be added in the next iteration (after mid-term),
> once the basic product is ready.
> But please keep note of these ideas. It will help make OGV a better GSoC
> project and a better BRL-CAD product.
> So basically quality of features > quantity of features :), in my opinion!
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Shubham Chauhan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
> brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel

Reply via email to