Hi,
Yatharth Agarwal has left the following comment at Add missing
documentation for any one command (#4)
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/8104208:
Re:
Actually, supplying the -O option to rt(1) makes it ouput a dpix (ie, a
double-precision color pixel file) rather than a pix(5) one. I couldn't
find any info on whther this format was actually portable — in the man
pages, HISTORY sections, the online documentation, or otherwise, — so I
left it like that. The dpix-pix(1) command converts it back to pix.
Do you think I should remove that sentence altogether? Or just mention that
supplying the -O option make it output the file in dpix format which might
be portable?
And I'll submit the HTML file, no worries. Thanks.
Greetings,
The Google Open Source Programs Team
---
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to Add missing
documentation for any one command (#4).
To stop receiving these messages, go to:
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/8104208.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Tracker mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-tracker
