On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Donn Washburn wrote:

> As a test i downloaded all of the autoconf, automake, autogen and
> libtool programs with the same version numbers \.  Built them, checked
> and removed the old before installing them. Tested and all worked.   
> I am
> still seeing the /bin problem.  It must be a version of them that has
> the problem.

Then the only recourse remaining that comes to mind is to trace the  
configure and Makefile logic to see exactly where/why it goes  
astray.  Investigating that, however, is probably going to be way too  
involved for a mailing list discussion.  I'd suggest starting out by  
opening a tracker report:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=105292&atid=640802

Post the specific steps you performed and attach your configure  
output and your config.log file for starters.

> Also compiling brlcad it wants to fail at /src/other/tcl and tk  
> because
> they are being overlooked.  One has cmake and the other has no  
> Makefile
> but has Makefile.am and .in.  Also misc/enigma (as I remember) has no
> Makefile yet has configure and Makefile.am and .in.

That sounds like configure wasn't run.  Those directories all run as  
subconfigures from the top-level configure so there may be some  
incompatibility with the newer autoconf you're using.  You'd need to  
either download a source tarball and NOT run autogen.sh (so it uses  
the existing generated logic) or wait until one of the devs has  
access to the newer autoconf to investigate.

Cheers!
Sean



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-users

Reply via email to