On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Dave Mielke wrote: > I haven't heard any feedback on the current implementation of this feature > yet, > but I do have a question about it: > > Right now, if at least one prompt pattern is defined then the original scheme > isn't used. I'm thinking that it might be more useful if the original scheme > were implicitly still used (as a fallback) in the case that none of the > patterns match.
I don't think that would be a good idea. If you did explicitly define a prompt match, that's most likely because the default one doesn't match what you want, or worse it matches what you don't want. So the best thing to do in that context is simply to alert the user that no matching prompts are available. Nicolas _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
