Aura Kelloniemi, le lun. 12 avril 2021 14:01:40 +0300, a ecrit: > On 2021-04-12 at 12:11 +0200, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Aura Kelloniemi, le lun. 12 avril 2021 12:58:53 +0300, a ecrit: > > > Could a new function brlapi_strerror_r be added that would be re-entrant? > > > We could define add this indeed. > > But the problems of strerror and gai_strerror not being re-entrant still > apply,
Yes, but strerror_r is available in posix 2001, and gai_strerror is not said to be non-threadsafe, so I guess it means it has to be. I guess we can thus safely assume that we can build a brlapi_strerror_r from that that is threadsafe on all current systems. > To what names does BRLAPI_MAXNAMELENGTH refer to? Currently that's only driver and model names. I don't think we want to use it for more than that. Samuel _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
