Dave Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Maybe we do, but I hope you won't mind to explain in a little bit more
>>detail why this change is actually necessary since I really am
>>dissatisfied with this configuration.
>
> Calm down! I'm no less dissatisfied than you are, and am trying very hard to 
> get things to work right. No need to get upset with me, though.

Sorry, this wasn't meant to be an insult. All I wanted was to make it
quite clear (not just to you but perhaps even more so to those who ask
for such a change) that this is an unconventional way to resolve the
matter. That's why I asked for some more explanation so other members of
this list might have a chance to give advice or to appreciate the
necessity of this step more easily.

> Your use of this list is a privilege and not a right.

I realise that and this change won't diminish that privilege.

>
> I hate having to get nasty with people, and regret having found the
>need to do
> so with you. Please let this be the last time.

I know that you usually are very patient, so I *must* have given the
wrong impression. Please accept my sincere apologies for having offended
you in such a way. In trying to make myself quite clear, I've obviously
ended up expressing myself to strongly.

Regards,

Elias
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected]
For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
  • [BRLTTY] List ... Informal discussion between users and developers of BRLTTY.
    • Re: [BRLT... Informal discussion between users and developers of BRLTTY.
    • Re: [BRLT... Informal discussion between users and developers of BRLTTY.
      • Re: [... Dave Mielke
        • R... Elias Oltmanns
          • ... Dave Mielke
        • R... Dave Mielke
          • ... Elias Oltmanns
      • Re: [... Jan and Bertil Smark Nilsson

Reply via email to