I'm having a hard time seeing why the whine from certain Linux setup packagers. Most of the default software they feel a need to put on the boot disk is at least an order of magnitude larger than brltty. <smile> Maybe it is just a bit a lip service to accessibility. LOL
Since all of these media images are pretty much CD/DVD any more I'd think we should be able to put the whole package in the boot. Have I missed something? <grin> J. R. -------------------- J. R. Westmoreland E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: GeneralJR -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Samuel Thibault Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 8:58 AM To: Informal discussion between users and developers of BRLTTY. Subject: Re: [BRLTTY] Keytables Dave Mielke, le Sat 18 Apr 2009 10:45:33 -0400, a écrit : > [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2009/04/18 at 16:36 +0200] > > >Being able to disable the use of libicu is a must for instance. > > So we should limit removal of these options to those which don't remove > dependencies on externally provided capabilities. What about ones like these: > > --disable-table-selection > --disable-preferences-menu In Debian we do not use them any more because the preference menu is an easy way for the user to choose the table after his braille device got automatically detected by USB. > --disable-contracted-braille That may be useful as it disables quite some code. Samuel _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
