> > It's currently defined in Constants.java using an octal constant, i.e. > 0200, so > that should be okay. I think the real problem is that those constants were > defined as ints rather than as chars.
I had already patched mine by changing Constants.java to define DOT8 as -0200, which worked perfectly. Even if they were chars, wouldn't you get compilation errors when trying to pack them into a byte[] array (signed) for writeDots? > This change has now been made. Please > retest it at your end. I've svn up'd to r4503, but cannot see any Java-related changes? Just in case an upstream change had been made that I couldn't see, I 'unapplied' my patch, svn up'd and rebuilt. However the DOT8 compilation errors occurred as expected. I've reverted to my -0200 patch for now.
_______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
