Hi, Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 09:27 +0800, 高生旺 a écrit : > Hi: > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dave Mielke wrote: > > If someone else were to build it for you, there's always the risk that > > something about the build won't match your system. It's really best if > > you could do it. > > Do you mean the static binary is not portable? In other words, I couldn't > use it for installing a new linux system? If so, I think I don't need it. Yes brltty is portable. But depends on who ports it, you can have brltty for various architectures: amd64, i386... depending on the host szstem of the people who builds. So there is always a risk you have a i386 whereas you want amd64... Moreover, he could enable options you don't want. Actually, hard if there's a problem and you don't know how to contact person to know how he built. So... bad idea I think.
> > Could you please > > capture a log of exactly which commands you're using and of exactly what > > output they produce, and then post it for us to have a look at? > In fact I can build it with no error messages output. But when I excute, > it only show teh version and url as same as I add -e and -ldebug > options. Don't you have something, for instance in /var/log/syslog? See also -l option which could give more information. How did you build (options? ...). What's the exact line? Did you try specifying --braille-device build option? Regards, > _______________________________________________ > This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. > To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] > For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty Jean-Philippe MENGUAL _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
