Hi! I sincerely regret but had never received any answer. Note that there is no any filter on my procmail or so: I only use Mutt+Fetchmail+Exim4 on a Debian system, and I'm surprised that only this Mailman machine doesn't reacts as the others I had submitted my address change.
Seeing this that's why I decided to mail privately to prevent too much noise on the ML. If there is a similar problem shoudn't that explain why I don't receive then any machineanswer ? I'm honestly not filtering! Can't explain. Sorry! Thanks for having shown the logs with my trials, so this means the request itself was received, but then I didn't receive any confirmation request! Bizarre :) Greetings, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:52:47PM -0500, Dave Mielke wrote: > Aside from the fact that you really ought to apologize for what amounts to > incredible rudeness, I decided to go have a look. > > It turns out that another user (I forget who) already told you a few days ago > what the problem must be. > > You yourself observed that every other Mailman server has been working > correctly. Why, then, would you simply assume that mine isn't working > properly? > > Would it surprise you to learn that my Mailman server is working just as > reliably as all the others? I count no less than thirteen attempts made by it > to send messages to your new address (see below). > > What the other user suggested to you was that some server, if not your own > spam > filtering, must be discarding those messages. It sure looks like that must be > the case. > > Note that, if this is so, then any attempt by me to personally reply to your > new address would likely also get dsicarded. Now what do you think about all > your claims that I haven't been responding to your private requests for help? > > Now, from my server's mail log, here are those 13 log entries. Notice that, > from my end, every attempt to send your new address a message was successful. > > Dec 2 07:31:36 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 2 11:07:14 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 5 04:42:54 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 5 05:02:33 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 5 06:30:44 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 5 06:30:44 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 5 14:09:49 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 5 14:28:23 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 6 14:33:42 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 6 15:11:29 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 12 09:54:21 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 12 12:28:39 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) > Dec 12 12:31:30 ... to=<osvaldo.lar...@.....> ... status=sent (250 OK , > completed) _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
