[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2011/10/25 at 19:14 -0400] >Excellent! It now works, thanks.
Well ... there's nothing like checking the code. :-) >While I'm on the line: Is there a specific way in which commands are >mapped when two definitions concur? E.G, if I keep >"RoutingKey+!RoutingKey COPYCHARS" as a statement, would both FWINRT and >COPYCHARS be executed? Is there some kind of precedence of execution >going on here I should be aware of? Yes, and no. If you bind a given key combination to two commands, it's undefined as to which one you'll get. Preference is given, however, to that which is more specific. Your explicit bindings, therefore, will take precendence to the general binding for COPYCHARS, so COPYCHARS will work for any two routing keys which you haven't yet made an explicit binding for. That's the way it's supposed to work, anyway. If it doesn't, please do let us know. -- Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God. Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | 2011 May 21 is the End of Salvation. EMail: [email protected] | Canada K2A 1H7 | 2011 Oct 21 is the End of the World. http://FamilyRadio.com/ | http://Mielke.cc/bible/ _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
