Hi all,This is the first time I've tried submitting a patch since the switch to Git. I wonder if this method is optimal:
I found errors in three words: Crosstree should not use the st sign Midafternoon should use the afternoon sign Middorsal should not use the dd sign in my opinionI made changes to /etc/brltty/en-us-g2.ctb. I saved the file and ran brltty-ctb to test it. (I don't run brltty itself because I haven't bothered to unsnarl the USB support in Cygwin.) When I verified my changes do what I want I did:
diff -c Tables/en-us-g2.ctb /etc/brltty/en-us-g2.ctb > Crosstree.patchBecause I have a bunch of private rules I don't think are robust enough or correct enough to inflict on others, I then edited Crosstree.patch and deleted lines following the last valid hunk. I tested the patch file with:
patch -p0 <Crosstree.patchIt updated the file in Tables which was what I wanted so I think this file is working properly. Is there anything different I should do to make things more reliable or aesthetic?
HTH, -- Lee Maschmeyer"Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise." --Lewis Carroll
Crosstree.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
