[quoted lines by S. Massy on 2014/10/23 at 20:53 -0400]

>> >Is this still supported/tested? When I enable the
>> >--enable-standalone-programs option, compilation aborts with complaints
>> >that memcpy is being redefined. 

This is an example of why I keep nagging people to post the log so that we can 
see the actual messages. The warning is about mempcpy - not memcpy. The 
problem, in this case, appears to be that you're using a newer gcc compiler 
with older brltty source. In other words, the older brltty source contains code 
which was okay at that time but which the newer gcc no longer likes.

You also have a couple of other errors:

>./options.c:825:5: error: initializer element is not constant
>     {.name=WC_C("ifset"), .processor=processIfSetOperands},
>     ^

>./options.c:826:5: error: initializer element is not constant
>     {.name=WC_C("ifnotset"), .processor=processIfNotSetOperands},
>     ^

These two lines really are actual errors. Specifically, in thesee two cases, 
WC_C() should be WC_S().

Is there any particular reason that you're trying to build such old brltty 
source?

-- 
Dave Mielke           | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God.
Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario   | http://Mielke.cc/bible/
EMail: [email protected] | Canada  K2A 1H7   | http://FamilyRadio.com/
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected]
For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty

Reply via email to