On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Nicolas Pitre on 2015/09/14 at 18:11 -0400] > > >I really do enjoy the current display refresh snappiness and > >I'd like for my refresh delay to remain at 0. > > Could you give the latest code (with a 5ms delay) a (fair) test? I don't > think > that this rather short delay is noticeable.
Agreed. > Fiddling with delayed reaction to cursor tracking could result in poor > tracking > of cursor routing. I'd say that depends. Normally, when cursor tracking is on, the cursor usually stays visible. When it moves out of the braille window, we want the later to follow immediately. If it happens to be a spurious move i.e the cursor returns to its original position then the window will move back just as quickly. That might be slightly annoying but the initial braille window is normally restored. But when tracking is on and the window was manually moved away from the cursor then a spurious cursor move becomes very irritating as the manually selected window location is lost in that case. A 5ms grace period might not be sufficient for the cursor to return to its original position. Hence my suggestion to re-evaluate a tracked cursor move after a longer delay when the initial cursor position is not within the braille window. This delay wouldn't apply when the cursor initial position is inside the braille window, which would be the common case when tracking is on. Nicolas _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
