[quoted lines by kendell clark on 2016/08/29 at 05:16 -0500] >would simplifying it to "braille" work? That way anyone with access to the >braille group could use braille, but anyone who wasn't couldn't.
You can name the group anything you'd like to. I fact, you can use any security paradigm you'd like to (including open). I was only making suggestions. >I'm finally beginning to understand why security is so tight. Think of it this way. The braille display is the blind user's screen. You wouldn't trust a system very much if any other user on the system could change your current screen content. You very rightly expect your screen to contain only the output from the command you're currently running, and you very rightly expect the system to enforce this. -- Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God. Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | http://Mielke.cc/bible/ EMail: [email protected] | Canada K2A 1H7 | http://FamilyRadio.org/ _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
