> > opaque of T > > Not sure I like this. It seems too similar to the current syntax of > tables and vectors (I do want to see the vector syntax eventually > though). It looks like T would be a yield value.
I see the similarity to other language elements rather as a consistent form of integration. Why would the "T of Y" syntax only pertain to container types? Admittedly, we have currently no other uses, but looks like a reasonable one to me. > opaque<MD5> While this looks good to folks familiar with C++ and templates, it looks like an exceptional one-off to the Bro language. As you said, it would involve tweaking both lexer and parser, and when is a about to happen, we should rethink the added value. Matthias _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
