On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:58 PM, Matthias Vallentin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Implement equivalence relation for opaque types.
> case TYPE_OPAQUE:
> - // FIXME: Should we downcast here and compare the opaque type names?
> - return 1;
> + {
> + const OpaqueType* ot1 = (const OpaqueType*) t1;
> + const OpaqueType* ot2 = (const OpaqueType*) t2;
> + return ot1->Name() == ot2->Name() ? 1 : 0;
> + }
When we implement opaque types, shouldn't we be able to supply an equivalency
testing function? Just comparing the types seems of limited use.
.Seth
--
Seth Hall
International Computer Science Institute
(Bro) because everyone has a network
http://www.bro-ids.org/
_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
