I already talked to Matthias but for the record, this looks good to me. One more question:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 15:24 -0700, you wrote: > (4) bloomfilter_merge(bf1: opaque of bloomfilter, bf2: opaque of > bloomfilter) : bool Is this merging bf2 into bf1? Would it make sense to return a new "opaque of bloomfilter" instead? Alternatively, we might need a bloomfilter_copy() for the case that one wants to merge without destroying any of the original filters. Robin -- Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 722-6541 * [email protected] ICSI/LBNL * Fax +1 (510) 666-2956 * www.icir.org/robin _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
