On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Robin Sommer <[email protected]> wrote: > One piece where I'm unsure: would it be better to keep the remote > serializer out if this and instead do a separate serializer/ hierarchy > where all the current serialization/communication code goes?
Maybe best would be if the remote serializer code is refactored so the code that implements the IOSource interface lives in the iosource/ tree, while the code that implements Serializer interface lives in a separate serializer/ tree? Though taking the reorg and plugin adaptation one step at a time would make sense to just stick it in iosource for now and then later consider what, if any, pieces to pull out and put in serializer/. - Jon _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
