> On May 24, 2016, at 12:07 PM, Siwek, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On May 23, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Slagell, Adam J <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I guess there is a balance here. If we do no mandatory checks and you could >> submit something that isn’t even a Bro plugin, the repository could become >> cluttered with junk. Do we really want things that don’t even “compile”? > > The clutter could still be removed by an out-of-band process. e.g. there’s > no initial check for whether a submission actually works, but after X days of > a nightly process finding it is broken, it gets auto-removed.
That is a good point. I am more concerned about accumulating clutter. ------ Adam J. Slagell Chief Information Security Officer Director, Cybersecurity Division National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign www.slagell.info "Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), any written communication to or from University employees regarding University business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure." _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
