> On May 26, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Robin Sommer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 20:56 -0700, you wrote: > >> Well it's there in CHANGES, per the appended. But yeah looks like it never >> went anywhere beyond the original instigation, so I think removing it is >> okay. > > Ah, I didn't realize this is what originally introduced the whole > traversal machinery. That infrastructure is used in a few places now, > and I'm not planing on touching that. Just removing this specific use > of finding NOTICEs, which doesn't seem anybody has been using in a > long time. > > Robin
It also has a minor issue that prevents it from being more useful, it outputs AddressScan instead of the fully namespaced Scan::AddressScan -- - Justin Azoff _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
