> On Dec 13, 2016, at 1:52 PM, Robin Sommer <[email protected]> wrote: > > My draft proposal extends > opaque types to support conversion to boolean to allow for more > elegant error checks.
Would that mean you wouldn't be able to return a bool and check for errors at the same time? -- - Justin Azoff _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
