> On Feb 13, 2018, at 11:36 AM, Seth Hall <s...@corelight.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 13 Feb 2018, at 11:31, Robin Sommer wrote:
> 
>> We could even go a step further and compile CAF statically into
>> libbroker, so that in the end from a user's perspective all they deal
>> with is Broker: if they link against it, they get everything they
>> need.
>> 
>> Would that make sense?
> 
> I think we're quite a ways off from CAF being generally packaged with 
> most operating systems (especially having the correct version to work 
> with broker).  I think that including it with broker and building libcaf 
> into libbroker statically makes sense too.  I've been concerned about 
> the difficulty of building Bro from source too.
> 
>   .Seth

This will also make

    pip install pybroker

feasible, which would be a huge usability improvement for integrating external 
systems with bro.


— 
Justin Azoff


_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
bro-dev@bro.org
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev

Reply via email to