> To be honest I'm not even sure if the behavior
> is defined right now, i.e. if the later value will overwrite the first one.
I don't think it's defined. Looking at the code, the later one will
indeed overwrite the first one.
> Do you want to error out when two &defaults are found or overwrite the
> first with the second one?
My thinking is that listing them together should be an error. I don't
see why it would be legitimate for this to occur, and it seems like a
mistake that could be made if there's a lengthy list of attributes.
Vern
_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
bro-dev@bro.org
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
