On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 23:17 -0400, Girish M G wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > Ah, okay. Its use of the API is restricted to tweaking the running > > system based on its own configuration data. Got it. > > Correct. nwamd wouldn't need ipadm persistence. > > However, on a related note, last time when I ran 'ppriv' on a running > instance of 'nwamd', it already had 'file_dac_write' privilege.
That's because it currently runs as root with all privileges. My point was that NWAM Phase 1 is changing that, but it's a moot point given NWAM's use of the API, as you and Sowmini have pointed out. Thanks, -Seb
