> > Right. And that's extremely fragile and readily reproducible, e.g. on > > DEBUG kernel with NWAM enabled. > > There's no accident involved. We did what we could at the time.
I don't see how the two are mutually exclusive :) If there's a more appropriate word to call it, call it that. Bottom line is, wifi property persistence is unreliable, more works needs to be done under RFE 6691666. -Artem
