> I mostly agree with this (and I communicated the same sentiment to > Girish and Sowmini yesterday over IRC), and we even had a long > discussion years ago about migrating all datalink and IP configuration > to SCF using per-link and per-interface service instances. It's > probably time that we get serious about doing this (at least for IP > interface configuration) if we want libipadm to be a usable and flexible > API.
Fishworks has done this, and I think it'd be safe to say this path is not without its own complications. We should have a chat about this at some point in the future, but suffice it to say that the path forward here is murky at best. -- meem
