Girish Moodalbail wrote: > Well what if the end user sets the property using ipadm on all > interfaces, as in: > > ipadm set-prop -m ip ip_def_ttl=128 > > Note: Currently for 'ipadm' you can either specify interface name or you > don't. If you specify the interface name it will be for that property. > But if you do specify then it's for all the interfaces. > > In that case we should allow it to be effected on all the interfaces, > right? Shouldn't that hold good with 'ndd' too? >
I guess that would be a 'nice to have' but I wouldn't see it as a requirement that an old tool reflects configuration set by a new one. Paul -- =================================== Paul Durrant http://www.linkedin.com/in/pdurrant ===================================
