Peter Memishian writes: > > I guess if we're going to consider all user space programs that fail > > to scale with huge numbers of interfaces to be "broken," then removing > > the tunable and the limit itself would be a good thing. > > In the absence of known specific issues that we can't fix ourselves (e.g., > popular third party application issues), this sounds like the sort of > limiter escape-hatch that belongs in /etc/system, not in ipadm.
Yes, I agree with that. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
