Hi Volker, Volker A. Brandt wrote: >>>> Also, you define build 88 to be the next version of OpenSolaris. >>>> I would just say "snv_88". In a little while, the "next version" >>>> will confuse people. >>> I think that refers to the OpenSolaris Developer Preview release, >>> rather than a particular Nevada build. > > I thought the authors just wanted to point out that snv_88 has not > been released at the time of writing. >
Thanks for your comments. You are correct: although the e1000g and nxge are in snv_88, they did not make it in time for the release of OpenSolaris 2005.08 (aka Indiana), based on snv_86. So they are expected to be in the "next" OpenSolaris release. However, we used the word "next" in order not to tie the hands of the OpenSolaris folks as they work at scheduling the next Indiana release - and maybe how it will be called! ;) But if it causes confusion, the reference to the "next OpenSolaris" can certainly be taken out and just refer to Nevada builds. Raoul
