Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
>> It isn't fair to say that the fact that I need this is "wrong". There
>> is software configuration data which must be made to reflect hardware
>> configuration, and which cannot be autodetected. There is also *policy*
>> data (tunables) for some things that you just can't automatically tune.
>> (Although you can provide reasonable default settings for those, and we
>> do that. But for certain kinds of extreme uses, manual tuning may be
>> required. E.g. applications with unusual latency requirements may
>> require a smaller buffer size than the default, or a higher interrupt
>> rate...)
>>
>
> IMHO there is a chasm of difference between driver tunables and
> application settings. I was making a point of focusing on the latter. GConf?
>
For the latter, GConf or other mechanisms (specific to the desktop
environment) may be appropriate. However, the problem I want to resolve
is more along the lines of the former.
-- Garrett
> -Artem
> _______________________________________________
> brussels-dev mailing list
> brussels-dev at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/brussels-dev
>
