Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
>
>> If you update to snv73, then I'd be happy to contribute effort to
>> update one or more of the legacy drivers. My first candidate might
>> be eri or qfe, but I'd also like to do iprb (which doesn't currently
>> support even NDD, but it really needs to have tunable support!)
>
> Great, we plan to resync with the latest onnv pretty soon. Hopefully
> by that time we'll solidify driver interfaces also (I have some
> changes in the pipeline, webrev will be posted to this list).
>
> Since onnv-gate itself is still on teamware and only maintains a
> read-only mercurial view, our process mirrors that of ON. Which means
> that external contributions need to go through a sponsor who has
> access to internal teamware workspace. Contributors with access to
> SWAN can work off /net/npt.sfbay/export/brussels/brussels-gate.
Thanks! (And yes, I'm on SWAN. :-) I guess I should use my @sun.com
address now... but @damore.org is what I subscribed to brussels-dev under.
If the driver interfaces are still in flux, I'd assume to wait until
they have settled somewhat... there is a possibility though that as I
work with the drivers I may have input for change in the API. I know
that I wish I had more input into *Nemo* interfaces as a result of my
experience with porting a boatload of drivers to Nemo.
-- Garrett
