[brussels-dev] Re: [networking-discuss] Re: [driver-discuss] Re: Brussels high-level design document

[Raymond LI - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China]

James Carlson wrote:
>   
>>> Would it be good for us to retain them somehow in early phase of Brussel, 
>>> like by ways of keep it as "private" properties? For backward compatibility 
>>> reason, some customers might rely on those private properties in their 
>>> production env. Before we provide enough tuning in framework, they will 
>>> lose nothing.
>>>       
>> I like Raymond's proposal..
>>     
>
> I'd rather see those things left behind whereever they are -- ndd,
> driver.conf -- and left out of Brussels user interfaces, with bugs
> filed to have them removed completely over time.
>
>   
So whether or not to keep those things is not a problem, the problem is 
where we keep them in Brussel?