Joost Mulders wrote: >>> I think we need a friendly UI for pause setting, while keeping the >>> ieee802.3 tunable as many as >>> possible. I wonder some users may really tweak these value, isn't it? >>> >>> > > The current goal for brussels is to unfiy link administration for > NIC's. If you want to *simplify* administration, my first bet would > be to allow string value's for properties in dladm. > > Currently, most parameters take a value of 0 or 1 because passing > strings using ndd is dificult (or impossible?). With string value's > one could say meaningful statements like > duplex=full > flowcontrol=send,accept > etc. This would allow collapsing of a lot of properties. > > If the value must be entered numerical I would stick with 1 or 0 (ON, > OFF) because it's difficult to remember the meaning of '5' in a link > property context :-) > Agree, we should use 0/1.
[brussels-dev] [driver-discuss] [networking-discuss] pausel bits setting within Solaris
Raymond LI - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:37:17 +0800
- [brussels-dev] [network... Raymond LI - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
- [brussels-dev] [network... Peter Memishian
- [brussels-dev] [network... Raymond LI - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
- [brussels-dev] [network... Peter Memishian
- [brussels-dev] [network... Raymond LI - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
- [brussels-dev] [network... Garrett D'Amore
- [brussels-dev] [network... [email protected]
- [brussels-dev] [network... Garrett D'Amore
- [brussels-dev] [network... [email protected]
- [brussels-dev] [network... Garrett D'Amore
- [brussels-dev] [driver-discu... Raymond LI - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
- [brussels-dev] [driver-discu... [email protected]
- [brussels-dev] [driver-discu... Garrett D'Amore
