> > Not anything really good -- "context"? "type"? "mode"? > > "type" and "mode" are likely to get mixed up with the link-type > and link-mode terminology.. context, maybe? is that more meaningful > than "param"?
I think so, but I'm biased ;-) > > But that means that whenever one uses -x, one has to widen her terminal > > past 80 columns, or the output becomes hard to read. Also, IIRC, keeping > > -x and -v separate matches what's being proposed for show-aggr post-UV. > > right, I see that. Also there may be more columns added down the > road, so the problem may get worse.. Yep. -- meem
